In Revenue Procedure 2022-19[1] the IRS has issued a series of “taxpayer assistance procedures” to resolve certain issues involving S corporations and their shareholders without requiring the issuance of a private letter ruling (PLR).

The areas covered by this guidance are:

Agreements and Arrangements with No Principal Purpose to Circumvent One Class of Stock Requirement
Governing Provisions That Provide for Identical Distribution and Liquidation Rights
Procedures for Addressing Missing Shareholder Consents, Errors with Regard to a Permitted Year, Missing Officer's Signature, and Other Inadvertent Errors and Omissions
Procedures for Verifying S Elections or QSub Elections
Procedures for Addressing a Federal Income Tax Return Filing Inconsistent with an S Election or a QSub Election
Procedures for Retroactively Correcting One or More Non-Identical Governing Provisions[2]

Details of the Six Areas

The procedure provides:

Sections 2.03(1) through 2.03(6) of this revenue procedure describe the six areas for which issues are resolvable without a PLR, and for which this revenue procedure provides taxpayer assistance procedures. With regard to the sixth area described in 2.03(6) of this revenue procedure (addressing potential retroactive correction of non-identical governing provisions), the validity or continuation of a corporation's S election is not affected in certain circumstances only if the corporation and its applicable shareholders (as defined in section 3.06(1)(a) of this revenue procedure) meet the requirements of section 3.06 of this revenue procedure.[3]

Agreements and Arrangements with No Principal Purpose to Circumvent One Class of Stock Requirement.

The Procedure describes the background for the first area of relief as follows:

(1) One class of stock requirement and governing provisions, including “principal purpose” conditions.

(a) Overview. Pursuant to § 1361(b) (1)(D) and § 1.1361-1(l)(1), a corporation that has more than one class of stock does not qualify as a small business corporation. Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) provides generally that a corporation is treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.

(b) Governing provisions. Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides that the determination of whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, applicable State law, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds (collectively, governing provisions). A commercial contractual agreement is not a binding agreement relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds, and therefore is not a governing provision, unless a principal purpose of the agreement is to circumvent the one class of stock requirement. See § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i).

(c) Other agreements and arrangements. The Income Tax Regulations identify a number of other agreements and arrangements between or among an S corporation and its shareholders that may or may not be treated as second classes of stock depending in part on whether a principal purpose of the agreement or arrangement was to circumvent the one class of stock requirement or otherwise alter shareholders' rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds. See § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(iii)(A) (buy-sell agreements among shareholders, agreements restricting the transferability of stock, and redemption agreements), § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(A) (special rules for instruments, obligations, or arrangements treated as equity under general principles of Federal tax law), § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(B)(1) (short-term unwritten advances that fail the safe harbor described in § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(B)(1)), and § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(B)(2) (obligations of the same class that are considered equity under general principles of Federal tax law but fail the safe harbor described in § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(B)(2)). See section 3.01 of this revenue procedure (providing that the IRS will not treat taxpayers who have entered into the agreements or arrangements described in this section 2.03(1)(c) as violating the one class of stock requirement of § 1361(b)(1)(D) so long as there was no principal purpose to use the agreement or arrangement as a means to circumvent the one class of stock requirement).[4]

The procedure provides the following relief regarding agreements and arrangements that had no principal purpose of circumventing the one class of stock requirement:

.01 Agreements and Arrangements with No Principal Purpose to Circumvent One Class of Stock Requirement. Certain agreements and arrangements described in section 2.03(1)(c) of this revenue procedure are not governing provisions and are not treated as second classes of stock so long as there was no principal purpose to use the agreement as a means to circumvent the one class of stock requirement. Accordingly, the IRS will not treat an S corporation as violating the one class of stock requirement of § 1361(b)(1)(D) as a result of an agreement or arrangement identified in section 2.03(1)(c) of this revenue procedure that does not have a principal purpose to circumvent the one class of stock requirement. Because entering into these specific agreements in these circumstances will not result in termination of S corporation status, taxpayers do not need to seek relief from the IRS. For this reason, and because the existence of a principal purpose is inherently factual in nature, the IRS will not rule in these situations. See section 4.01(1) of this revenue procedure.[5]

Essentially, the IRS has indicated that the agency will not issue a PLR with regard to such an arrangement if the principal purpose of the arrangement is not to evade the one class of stock rules and the procedure specifically provides the IRS will not issue a PLR on whether an arrangement has such a principal purpose:

(1) Principal purpose determinations regarding the one class of stock requirement. The IRS will not issue a PLR under § 1362(f) addressing the validity or continuation of an S election in situations regarding the one class of stock requirement that require a determination of the existence of a principal purpose because such a determination is inherently factual in nature. See section 6.02 of Rev. Proc. 2022-1 (or any successor revenue procedure). Accordingly, the IRS will not issue a PLR under § 1362(f) addressing:

(a) For purposes of determining whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds under § 1.1361-1(l)(2), whether a principal purpose of a commercial contractual agreement, buy-sell agreement, an agreement restricting the transferability of stock, or a redemption agreement is to circumvent the one class of stock requirement of § 1361(b)(1)(D) and § 1.1361-1(l) (see § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) and (iii)(A)(1)); or

(b) For purposes of determining whether an instrument, obligation, or arrangement is treated as a second class of stock, whether:

(i) A principal purpose of issuing or entering into an instrument, obligation, or arrangement is to circumvent the rights to distribution or liquidation proceeds conferred by the outstanding shares of stock or to circumvent the limitation on eligible shareholders contained in § 1.1361-1(b)(1) (see § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(A)(2)); or

(ii) A principal purpose of an unwritten advance or proportionately held obligation is to circumvent the rights of the outstanding shares of stock or the limitation on eligible shareholders under § 1.1361‑1(l)(4)(ii)(A)(2) (see § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii)(B)).[6]

Governing Provisions That Provide for Identical Distribution and Liquidation Rights

The second area deemed resolvable without obtaining a private letter ruling relates to disproportionate distributions:

(2) Disproportionate distributions. A “disproportionate distribution” is any distribution (including an actual distribution, a constructive distribution, or a deemed distribution) of property by a corporation with respect to shares of its stock that differs in timing or amount from the distribution with respect to any other shares of its stock. See § 1.1361‑1(l)(1) and (2). Section 1.1361‑1(l)(2)(i) provides that, “[a]lthough a corporation is not treated as having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights, any distributions (including actual, constructive, or deemed distributions) that differ in timing or amount are to be given appropriate tax effect in accordance with the facts and circumstances.” Despite this regulation providing that “a corporation is not treated as having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights,” taxpayers and practitioners have indicated concern with the language of § 1.1361‑1(l)(2)(i). The articulated concern is that the word “although” in combination with the subsequent language requiring that certain disproportionate distributions “be given appropriate tax effect” creates uncertainty as to whether an S corporation has created a second class of stock — even though the governing provisions provide identical distribution and liquidation rights with respect to each share. Practitioners suggest that the language in § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) could be clarified by removing the word “[a]lthough” and point to inconsistency in PLRs in the treatment of disproportionate distributions. See section 3.02 of this revenue procedure (providing that the IRS will not treat any disproportionate distributions by a corporation as violating the one class of stock requirement of § 1361(b)(1)(D) so long as the corporation’s governing provisions provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights).[7]

In this case the IRS provides for the following relief and also adds this item as one on which the agency will not issue a private letter ruling:

.02 Governing Provisions That Provide for Identical Distribution and Liquidation Rights. As outlined in section 2.03(2) of this revenue procedure, § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides that a corporation is not treated as having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights. Accordingly, the IRS will not treat any disproportionate distributions made by a corporation as violating the one class of stock requirement of § 1361(b)(1)(D) so long as the governing provisions of the corporation provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights. Because disproportionate distributions made in these circumstances will not result in the termination of S corporation status, taxpayers do not need to seek relief from the IRS and the IRS will not rule in these situations. See section 4.01(2)(a) of this revenue procedure.[8]

Procedures for Addressing Missing Shareholder Consents, Errors with Regard to a Permitted Year, Missing Officer’s Signature, and Other Inadvertent Errors and Omissions

The next section governs inadvertent errors or omissions on the Form 2553 or Form 8869:

(3) Certain inadvertent errors or omissions on Form 2553 or Form 8869. An inadvertent error or omission on Form 2553 or Form 8869 does not invalidate an S election or a QSub election, unless the error or omission is with respect to a shareholder consent, a selection of a permitted year (as defined in § 1378(b) and § 1.1378-1(b)), or an officer's signature. See generally § 1362(a)(2) (an S election is valid “only if all persons who are shareholders in such corporation on the day on which such election is made consent to such election”), § 1.1378-1 (requiring that the taxable year of an S corporation must be a permitted year, which is defined to include a calendar year or any other taxable year for which the corporation establishes a business purpose to the satisfaction of the Commissioner), and § 1.1361-3(a)(2) (a QSub election form must be signed by a person authorized to sign the S corporation's return). See section 3.03 of this revenue procedure (providing procedures for a taxpayer to correct, without the receipt of a PLR, an error, an omission, or a missing required consent on a Form 2553 or Form 8869).[9]

The Procedure provides the following procedures for specific omissions and errors.

Missing Shareholder Consent

The Procedure provides a set of potential methods to correct the situation where a shareholder consent is missing, only providing for a PLR if none of the others apply:

An S election that fails to include the consent of a shareholder may be corrected pursuant to the following:

(a) Section 1.1362-6(b)(3)(iii) (providing an extension of time for filing a shareholder consent to an S election);

(b) Rev. Proc. 2013-30 (providing a simplified method for taxpayers to request relief for late S elections);

(c) Rev. Proc. 2004-35, 2004-1 C.B. 1029 (providing automatic relief for certain taxpayers requesting relief for late shareholder consents for S elections in community property States); or

(d) If the remedies listed in section 3.03(1)(a) through (c) of this revenue procedure do not apply, a taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative may request relief by submitting a request for a PLR under § 1362(f) to the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).[10]

Correction of an Error With Regard to a Permitted Year

For an error related to a permitted year, the IRS again reminds taxpayers of automatic relief options before allowing for a PLR to be issued:

A Form 2553 that contains an inadvertent error with regard to a permitted year may be corrected pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2013-30 (providing a simplified method for taxpayers to request relief for late S elections). If a taxpayer is not eligible for relief under Rev. Proc. 2013-30, a correction may be obtained through the receipt of a PLR under § 1362(f) from the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).[11]

Correction of Missing Officer’s Signature

In the case of a missing officer’s signature, the Procedure first directs taxpayers to the existing standard late S election relief:

A Form 2553 or Form 8869 that is missing the signature of an authorized officer of the S corporation that affects the validity of the S election or QSub election may be corrected pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2013-30 (providing a simplified method for taxpayers to request relief for late S elections and QSub elections). If a taxpayer is not eligible for relief under Rev. Proc. 2013-30, a correction may be obtained through the receipt of a PLR under § 1362(f) from the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).[12]

Correction of Other Inadvertent Errors or Omissions

The Procedure concludes with a simplified process to deal with other inadvertent errors or omissions not covered by the previous sections:

Errors and omissions on Form 2553 or Form 8869, other than those addressed in section 3.03(1) through (3) of this revenue procedure, may be corrected by explaining in writing the error(s) or omission(s) and the necessary correction(s) and submitting the written explanation to one of the following addresses (depending on the Internal Revenue Submission Processing Center with which the S corporation files its Form 1120-S) or any successor address the IRS may provide:

(a) Internal Revenue Service, MS 6055, 333 W. Pershing Rd., Kansas City, MO 64108.

(b) Internal Revenue Service, MS 6273, 1973 N. Rulon White Blvd., Ogden, UT 84404.[13]

No PLRs Issued for Certain Inadvertent Errors, Omissions, or Missing Required Consents

Again the Procedure provides that the IRS will not generally issue rulings for any such issues other than those where the Procedure specifically provides that a PLR should be requested:

The IRS will not issue a PLR under § 1362(f) regarding any error or omission described in section 3.03(4) of this revenue procedure. Such inadvertent errors or omissions do not impact a corporation’s S election or QSub election. See section 2.03(3) of this revenue procedure. The IRS will also not issue a PLR under § 1362(f) for a missing required consent, errors with regard to a permitted year, or a missing officer’s signature where the taxpayer qualifies for relief under any of the means of relief identified in section 3.03(1) through (3) of this revenue procedure. The Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) will consider the issuance of a PLR only if the error or omission concerns a shareholder consent, the selection of a permitted year, or a missing officer’s signature, and the taxpayer has no other means of requesting relief. See section 4.02(2) of this revenue procedure.[14]

Procedures for Verifying S Elections or QSub Elections

The Procedure discusses issues where the corporation is unable to locate the letter from the IRS accepting the S election or QSub election:

Generally, within 90 days after the IRS receives a corporation’s Form 2553, the IRS mails a CP261 Notice as an acknowledgment to the corporation that the IRS has accepted the corporation’s filing. For QSub elections filed on Form 8869, the IRS mails a CP279 Notice to the filer and a CP279A Notice to the subsidiary, generally within 60 days after the IRS accepts the QSub election. A lack of written acknowledgement that the IRS has accepted the corporation’s S election or its subsidiary’s QSub election (for example, because it was lost or never received) creates uncertainty for some taxpayers about the validity of the election. However, neither subchapter S of the Code nor the Income Tax Regulations thereunder provide that a lack of possession of a CP261 Notice, CP279 Notice, or CP279A Notice affects the validity of an S election or a QSub election, respectively. Rather, such notices are merely administrative acknowledgments of an effective election that can be reproduced upon the taxpayer’s request. See section 3.04 of this revenue procedure (providing procedures to replace a missing CP261 Notice, CP279 Notice, or CP279A Notice).[15]

The Procedure adds an exclusive method for requesting an additional copy of these letters:

(1) Availability of replacement letters. With regard to a missing administrative acceptance letter for an S election or an administrative acceptance letter for a QSub election, as appropriate, a replacement letter may be requested:

(a) For an S corporation and shareholders of an S corporation, by contacting the IRS Business and Specialty Tax Line at 800-829-4933; and

(b) For practitioners, by contacting the IRS Practitioner Priority Service at 866‑860‑4259.[16]

Not surprisingly, what cannot be done is request a PLR on the issue:

(2) Unavailability of a PLR. The IRS will not issue a PLR under § 1362(f) with regard to any missing administrative acceptance letter described in section 3.04(1) of this revenue procedure. See section 4.01(2) of this revenue procedure. A missing administrative acceptance letter does not impact an S election or a QSub election. See section 2.03(4) of this revenue procedure.[17]

Procedures for Addressing a Federal Income Tax Return Filing Inconsistent with an S Election or a QSub Election

The Procedure describes the following problem that sometimes arises with S corporations:

Occasionally, a corporation files a Federal income tax return that is inconsistent with the corporation’s status as an S corporation or a QSub (for example, an S corporation files a Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, or Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, instead of Form 1120-S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation). Although an inconsistent Federal income tax return filing can create several complications for the filer, nothing in the Code or Income Tax Regulations thereunder provides that such a filing affects the validity of a corporation’s S election or QSub election. For example, neither § 1362(d) nor § 1.1361-5(a) lists an inconsistent Federal income tax return filing as an event that gives rise to a termination of an S election or a QSub election. See section 3.05 of this revenue procedure (providing procedures for taxpayers to address, without the receipt of a PLR, a Federal income tax return filing inconsistent with an S election or a QSub election, as appropriate).[18]

The Procedure provides the following method to resolve this issue:

(1) Filing a corrected original return or an amended return. An S corporation, or a parent S corporation of a QSub, that files a Federal income tax return for a taxable year that is inconsistent with the status of the corporation as an S corporation, or inconsistent with the status of a subsidiary of the parent S corporation as a QSub, must file a Federal income tax return for open taxable years consistent with its status, as appropriate —

(a) to reflect the status of the corporation as an S corporation or parent of a QSub; or

(b) to reflect the status of the subsidiary as a QSub.[19]

The Procedure provides the following guidance regarding the federal income tax effect of a corporation’s prior transactions in this case:

Because a corporation is not treated as having terminated its S election or QSub election, as appropriate, merely due to the filing of one or more Federal income tax returns inconsistent with its S election or QSub election, the corporation’s distributions and other transactions will be treated consistent with its status as an S corporation or a QSub, as appropriate. Thus, a QSub’s income or deductions will be treated as income or deductions of the parent S corporation and distributions between the QSub and its parent will be disregarded.[20]

As with prior issues, the IRS provides no private letter rulings will be issued in this area:

The IRS will not issue a PLR under § 1362(f) with regard to any inconsistent return filing described in section 3.05(1) of this revenue procedure. See section 4.01(2) of this revenue procedure. Such an inconsistent return filing does not impact an S election or a QSub election. See section 2.03(5) of this revenue procedure.[21]

Procedures for Retroactively Correcting One or More Non-Identical Governing Provisions

The most complex taxpayer assistance procedure involves a case where the governing provisions create non-identical rights to regular or liquidating distributions, triggering a second class of stock. This can happen when standard boilerplate language is added to corporate documents when having both voting and non-voting stock that can provide for separate declarations of distributions to each type of stock. This creates a problem even if no disproportionate distribution ever takes place.

A similar problem can arise with LLC operating agreements when the “check the box” corporation takes on more than one member and the language of the operating agreement provides for any possibility of differing distribution rights.

The Procedure describes the problem as follows:

(6) Non-identical governing provisions.

(a) Overview. Section 1361(b)(1)(D) requires an S corporation to have only one class of stock. Section 1.1361-1(l) provides that a corporation is treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of the corporation's stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds and if the corporation has not issued any instrument or obligation, or entered into any arrangement, that is treated as a second class of stock. An S corporation in compliance with § 1.1361-1(l) is commonly referred to as having “identical governing provisions.” The term “non-identical governing provision” means a governing provision, as defined by § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i), on its own or as part of another governing provision, that for Federal income tax purposes results in the S corporation having more than one class of stock under § 1.1361-1(l)(1) (even if the S corporation never made a non-pro rata distribution or liquidating distribution).

(b) Consequences of non-identical governing provisions. If an entity files an S election when it has more than a single class of stock, the entity does not meet the requirements to be an S corporation and its attempted election is invalid. See § 1361(a)(1). If a valid S corporation later provides for more than a single class of stock, its S election automatically terminates on the day the disqualifying event occurs. See § 1362(d)(2). See section 3.06 of this revenue procedure (providing procedures for correcting, without the receipt of a PLR, the validity or continuation of an S election with regard to one or more non‑identical governing provisions, as defined in section 2.03(6)(a) of this revenue procedure).[22]

The relief provisions for this problem are much longer than those for the other areas.

Definitions

The Procedure provides the following definitions for this relief procedures:

Applicable shareholder. The term “applicable shareholder” means a current or former shareholder of a corporation who owns or owned stock of the corporation at any time during the period:
- (i) Beginning on the date on which the non-identical governing provision was adopted (on its own or as part of another governing provision); and
- (ii) Ending on the date on which the nonidentical governing provision was removed or modified in a manner such that the governing provision complies with the one class of stock requirement.
Discovered by the IRS. The term “discovered by the IRS” has the meaning given the term in § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations (26 CFR part 301).
Disproportionate distribution. The term “disproportionate distribution” is defined in section 2.03(2) of this revenue procedure.
Non-identical governing provision. The term “non-identical governing provision” is defined in section 2.03(6)(a) of this revenue procedure.[23]

Retroactive Corrective Relief Procedures

The Procedure provides a series of steps at Section 3.06(2) that must be followed to obtain retroactive relief. The section provides:

(a) Retroactive continuing validity of S election. If an S corporation and its applicable shareholders meet the requirements of this section 3.06, an S election that is invalid or terminated solely as the result of one or more non-identical governing provisions will be treated for Federal income tax purposes as continuing from the date on which the first non-identical governing provision that invalidated or terminated the corporation’s S election was adopted.[24]

To be eligible for retroactive relief, the corporation must meet the following requirements:

(b) Eligibility. A small business corporation and each applicable shareholder of the corporation are eligible for corrective relief under this section 3.06 if the following requirements are satisfied:

(i) The corporation has or had one or more non-identical governing provisions;

(ii) The corporation has not made, and for Federal income tax purposes is not deemed to have made, a disproportionate distribution to an applicable shareholder;

(iii) The corporation timely filed a return on Form 1120-S (as required under § 6037 of the Code and § 1.6037-1 of the Income Tax Regulations) for each taxable year of the corporation beginning with the taxable year in which the first non-identical governing provision was adopted and through the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the corporation made a request for corrective relief under this section 3.06 (a corporation is treated as having timely filed a required Form 1120-S under this section 3.06(2)(b)(iii) if the Form 1120-S is filed within six months after its original due date, excluding extensions); and

(iv) Before any non-identical governing provision is discovered by the IRS, all of the requirements described in section 3.06(2)(c) of this revenue procedure are satisfied.[25]

The following corrective relief statements are also required to obtain retroactive relief:

(c) Corrective relief statements.

(i) Corporate governing provision and shareholder statements. The corporation must complete a Corporate Governing Provision Statement in accordance with section 3.06(2)(c)(ii) of this revenue procedure and a Shareholder Statement signed by each applicable shareholder in accordance with section 3.06(2)(c)(iii) of this revenue procedure.

(ii) Corporate Governing Provision Statement. The Corporate Governing Provision Statement, a sample of which is provided in Appendix A, must be completed in accordance with this section 3.06(2)(c)(ii).

(A) Designation. The Corporate Governing Provision Statement must state at the top of the document: “CORPORATE GOVERNING PROVISION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO REV. PROC. 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(c)(ii)”.

(B) Information. The Corporate Governing Provision Statement must provide the following information:

(1) The date of the Corporate Governing Provision Statement, the corporation's name, employment identification number (EIN), address, date of formation or incorporation, and State of formation or incorporation;

(2) The actual or intended effective date of the corporation's S election filed on Form 2553 (see Form 2553, Part I, line E) that is the subject of the request for corrective relief under this section 3.06;

(3) The name, address, and social security number or taxpayer identification number of each applicable shareholder; and

(4) To establish an inadvertent termination or invalidation of the S election of the corporation, a description of all relevant facts regarding why each non-identical governing provision was adopted, how each non‑identical governing provision was discovered, and each action taken to correct or remove each non-identical governing provision before any non-identical governing provision is discovered by the IRS. This description must include each action taken by the corporation and each applicable shareholder to establish that the corporation and each applicable shareholder acted reasonably and in good faith in correcting or removing each non-identical governing provision upon discovery to demonstrate reasonable cause for relief.

(C) Representations. Except as provided in section 3.06(2)(c)(ii)(D), the corporation must provide the following four representations:

(1) “The corporation's S election was inadvertently invalid or terminated solely because of the adoption of one or more non-identical governing provisions.”;

(2) “The corporation and each applicable shareholder satisfy all of the requirements set forth in section 3.06 of Rev. Proc. 2022-19.”;

(3) “The corporation responds in the negative to each requested statement set forth in section 7.01(4) or (5) of Rev. Proc. 2022-1, or any successor revenue procedure (statements regarding whether the same or a similar issue was previously ruled on or whether a request involving the same or a similar issue was submitted or is currently pending).”; and

(4) “The corporation and each applicable shareholder acted reasonably and in good faith in correcting or removing each non-identical governing provision upon discovery.”.

(D) Explanation regarding previously ruled on, submitted, or pending PLRs. If the corporation cannot respond in the negaive to any requested statement set forth in section 7.01(4) or (5) of Rev. Proc. 2022‑1, or any successor revenue procedure (and therefore cannot make the representation described in section 3.06(2)(c)(ii)(C)(3) of this revenue procedure), the corporation must provide an explanation for each such response as part of the description of all relevant facts required by section 3.06(2)(c)(ii)(B)(4) of this revenue procedure.

(E) Statements. The corporation must provide the statements set forth in section 3.06(2)(c)(ii)(E)(1) through (3) of this revenue procedure:

(1) “The corporation acknowledges that the relief provided by section 3.06 of Rev. Proc. 2022-19 is limited solely to each non-identical governing provision described in this Corporate Governing Provision Statement.”;

(2) “The corporation acknowledges that the relief provided by section 3.06 of Rev. Proc. 2022-19 is based solely on the information, representations, and other statements provided by the corporation pursuant to section 3.06 of Rev. Proc. 2022-19, each of which is subject to verification during IRS examination.”; and

(3) “During the period between the date on which the non-identical governing provision became effective and the date on which all of the procedures described in section 3.06 of Rev. Proc. 2022-19 are completed, each applicable shareholder has reported their income on all affected returns consistent with the S corporation election for the taxable year the non-identical governing provision became effective and for all subsequent years for which each applicable shareholder owned shares of the corporation.”.

(F) Signature. The Corporate Governing Provision Statement must be signed under penalties of perjury by a person authorized to sign the corporation's Federal income tax return under § 6062 of the Code. The penalties of perjury statement must be provided in the following format: “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this Corporate Governing Provision Statement for corrective relief for one or more non-identical governing provisions, as provided by Rev. Proc. 2022-19, section 3.06, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request contains all the relevant facts, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”.

(iii) Shareholder Statement. The Shareholder Statement, a sample of which is provided in Appendix B, must be completed in accordance with this section 3.06(2)(c)(iii).

(A) Designation. The Shareholder Statement must state at the top of the document: “SHAREHOLDER STATEMENT PURSUANT TO REV. PROC. 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(c)(iii)”.

(B) Information. The Shareholder Statement must provide:

(1) The date of the Shareholder Statement, the corporation's name, EIN, address, date of formation or incorporation, and State of formation or incorporation;

(2) The name and address of each applicable shareholder;

(3) The social security number or taxpayer identification number of each applicable shareholder;

(4) The number of shares of stock or, in the case of a limited liability company, percentage of ownership each applicable shareholder owns or owned and the date(s) the stock was acquired and, if applicable, transferred; and

(5) The date that each applicable shareholder provided their signature, as required by section 3.06(2)(c)(iii)(D) of this revenue procedure.

(C) Statement of consent. Each applicable shareholder must provide the following statement of consent: “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I consent to the election of [insert corporation's name], referred to herein as “the Corporation,” located at [insert the Corporation's address], whose employment identification number (EIN) is [insert the Corporation's EIN], to be an S corporation under § 1362(a)(1) of the Code. I have examined this consent statement, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request for corrective relief contains all the relevant facts, and such facts are true, correct, and complete. I understand that my consent is binding and may not be withdrawn after the Corporation receives relief pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2022-19, section 3.06. I also declare under penalties of perjury that I have reported my income on all affected returns consistent with the Corporation's election to be an S corporation for the taxable year for which the election would have been in effect but for the non-identical governing provision(s) described in the Corporate Governing Provision Statement for corrective relief and for all subsequent years I have owned shares of the Corporation.”.

(D) Signature. The Shareholder Statement must be signed under penalties of perjury by each applicable shareholder.[26]

Finally, there is a record retention requirement for this relief:

(d) Record retention requirement. The corporation is required to retain the Corporate Governing Provision Statement, the Shareholder Statement(s), and the revised governing provisions in accordance with § 6001 of the Code and the Income Tax Regulations thereunder. The Corporate Governing Provision Statement, the Shareholder Statement(s), and the revised governing provisions must be retained by the corporation for inspection by authorized Internal Revenue officers or employees, and must be retained so long as the contents thereof may become material in the administration of any provision of the Code or the Income Tax Regulations. See § 1.6001-1(e).[27]

If the taxpayer does not qualify for the above retroactive relief, then the following procedures must be used to request a private letter ruling:

(e) Alternative relief.

(i) General rule. An S corporation or applicable shareholder that does not qualify for corrective relief under this section 3.06 may seek corrective relief through a request submitted by the S corporation, applicable shareholder, or authorized representative (as appropriate) to the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) for a PLR. The request must provide the required explanation described in section 3.06(2)(e)(ii) of this revenue procedure. See generally Rev. Proc. 2022-1 (or any successor revenue procedure).

(ii) Required explanation. A request for a PLR by an S corporation or applicable shareholder, or authorized representative, under section 3.06(2)(e)(i) of this revenue procedure must include an explanation regarding each reason why the requirements for corrective relief under this section 3.06 could not be satisfied.[28]

[1] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, October 11, 2022, https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/irs-guidance/revenue-procedures/letter-rulings-not-needed-for-some-s-corp-election-requests/7f7bl (retrieved October 8, 2022)

[2] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, October 11, 2022

[3] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 2.03, October 11, 2022

[4] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 2.03(1), October 11, 2022

[5] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.01, October 11, 2022

[6] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 4.01(1), October 11, 2022

[7] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 2.03(2), October 11, 2022

[8] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.02, October 11, 2022

[9] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 2.03(3), October 11, 2022

[10] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.03(1), October 11, 2022

[11] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.03(2), October 11, 2022

[12] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.03(3), October 11, 2022

[13] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.03(4), October 11, 2022

[14] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.03(5), October 11, 2022

[15] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.03(5), October 11, 2022

[16] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.04, October 11, 2022

[17] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.04, October 11, 2022

[18] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 2.03(5), October 11, 2022

[19] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.05(1), October 11, 2022

[20] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.05(3), October 11, 2022

[21] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.05(2), October 11, 2022

[22] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 2.03(6), October 11, 2022

[23] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(1), October 11, 2022

[24] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(a), October 11, 2022

[25] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(b), October 11, 2022

[26] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(c), October 11, 2022

[27] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(d), October 11, 2022

[28] Revenue Procedure 2022-19, SECTION 3.06(2)(e), October 11, 2022