Taxpayer Not Allowed to Use Step Transaction Doctrine to Escape Consequences of Prohibited Transaction With His IRA
Of the three issues raised in the case of Thiessen v. Commissioner, 146 TC No. 7, the first will likely evoke a sense of déjà vu in some readers. And you will be right—the facts for the first issue (did the beneficiaries of two IRAs participate in prohibited transactions causing the entire IRA balances to be immediately taxable) are very similar to those the Tax Court had previously ruled upon in the case of Peek v. Commissioner, 140 TC 216 back in 2013.
However the taxpayer would introduce two defenses to the imposition of tax in this situation the court would view—but the Court would not use the step transaction doctrine to view the transaction in the taxpayer’s favor in these areas.
Read More