Attorney Who Believed His CPA Had Filed for An Extension Did Not Have Reasonable Cause for Late Filing
In the case of Baer v. United States,[1] US Court of Federal Claims, Case No. 19-1439, an attorney argued that because he believed that his CPA had filed for an extension of time to file his personal income tax return, he should be granted reasonable cause relief from a failure to file penalty. The Court denied the request, finding that, per the Supreme Court’s precedent in the Boyle case[2] the timely filing of the extension was a nondelegable duty of the taxpayer.
The case involved a taxpayer who had engaged a CPA to prepare his tax return. Each year the taxpayer had not been ready to file by April 15, and therefore an extension of time to file the return was required to be requested.
Read More