Since Lender Did Not Take Judicial Actions Required for Deficiency Judgment Under State Law, Short Sale Debt Treated as Nonrecourse Debt
In the case of Duffy v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2020-108,[1] the Tax Court gave its view of what impact a state’s law had on whether a debt in question was recourse or nonrecourse.
Short Sales: Recourse vs. Nonrecourse Debts
In this case the issue was key because the taxpayers had entered into a short sale of a residence that had total outstanding debt secured by the property in excess of its fair market value.
Petitioners sold the Gearhart property in March 2011 for $800,000. JPMorgan Chase agreed to accept $750,841 of the proceeds in full satisfaction of the mortgage loan that encumbered the property. The documents which the parties stipulated regarding petitioners’ sale of the Gearhart property do not include any judicial filings by JPMorgan Chase and make no reference to judicial proceedings to enforce petitioners’ obligation to the bank.[2]
The $750,841 that JPMorgan Chase accepted in full payment was $626,046 less than the unpaid principal balance of that mortgage at the time.[3]
Read More