Tax Court's Statements in Prior Case That a Guilty Plea to Tax Evasion Mandates a Deficiency Finding Held to Be "Mere Dicta" When Court Confronted With Evidence That Did Not Support Such a Finding
Tax advisers who look over tax cases and read opinions need to be careful about the level of reliance they place on statements made by the court in the case that do not directly impact the ultimate decision. Merriam Webster’s online dictionary defines dicta as “a judge's expression of opinion on a point other than the precise issue involved in determining a case.”
In the case of Senyszyn v. Commissioner, 146 TC No 9, the Tax Court ended up ultimately ruling in the opposite manner to a rather clear statement the Court had made in the case of Anderson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-44.
Read More